La risposta di Mark Zuckerberg alla vicenda Cambridge Analytica si è fatta attendere qualche giorno di troppo, ma è arrivata ieri con un discorso appassionato, che è anche un’ammissione di colpa senza se e senza ma.
Cosa questo possa significare è tutto da vedere: la moda degli ultimi anni davanti a scandali colossali è quella di presentarsi in pubblico, dire “è colpa mia”, ma non è poi chiarissimo quale sia il risultato di tale ammissione di colpa.
La risposta di Mark Zuckerberg: cambieremo 3 cose
Dopo essere stato sollecitato da più parti, con i media che chiedevano in modo pressante dove fosse finito Mark in un momento così delicato per la sua azienda (e i suoi investitori), ieri finalmente il grande capo di Facebook ha rilasciato una dichiarazione, che è la sua risposta ai tanti interrogativi di questi giorni.
Ecco i 3 provvedimenti che verranno adottati immediatamente da Facebook per contrastare lo sfruttamento dei dati:
- Nella newsfeed in luogo molto visibile sarà possibile controllare chi ha accesso ai nostri dati
- Verrà drasticamente ristretto l’accesso ai dati da parte degli sviluppatori
- Verrà fatta un’indagine su tutte le app che hanno avuto accesso ad una quantità significativa di dati prima del 2014, quando sono cambiate le politiche di facebook.
Quanto valgono queste iniziative? Quanto efficaci saranno i provvedimenti? Ci vorrà tempo per scoprirlo, ma ancora una volta torna il tema che vi ho proposto un paio di giorni fa. Siamo noi che dobbiamo cambiare l’approccio all’uso delle piattaforme. Non vi chiedete cosa possano fare gli altri per la vostra privacy, ma cosa potete fare voi.
Non ci sarà mai piattaforma che ci difenderà dall’uso improprio di dati, perché facebook non vive della voglia di metterci in contatto con gli amichetti dell’asilo, ma della conoscenza di chi siamo e di cosa facciamo, ma soprattutto di cosa ci piace.
Ecco il comunicato ufficiale di Mark Zuckerberg e Facebook dopo la vicenda di questi giorni
La La risposta di Mark Zuckerberg: il comunicato completo
I want to share an update on the Cambridge Analytica situation — including the steps we’ve already taken and our next steps to address this important issue.
We have a responsibility to protect your data, and if we can’t then we don’t deserve to serve you. I’ve been working to understand exactly what happened and how to make sure this doesn’t happen again. The good news is that the most important actions to prevent this from happening again today we have already taken years ago. But we also made mistakes, there’s more to do, and we need to step up and do it.
Here’s a timeline of the events:
In 2007, we launched the Facebook Platform with the vision that more apps should be social. Your calendar should be able to show your friends’ birthdays, your maps should show where your friends live, and your address book should show their pictures. To do this, we enabled people to log into apps and share who their friends were and some information about them.
In 2013, a Cambridge University researcher named Aleksandr Kogan created a personality quiz app. It was installed by around 300,000 people who shared their data as well as some of their friends’ data. Given the way our platform worked at the time this meant Kogan was able to access tens of millions of their friends’ data.
In 2014, to prevent abusive apps, we announced that we were changing the entire platform to dramatically limit the data apps could access. Most importantly, apps like Kogan’s could no longer ask for data about a person’s friends unless their friends had also authorized the app. We also required developers to get approval from us before they could request any sensitive data from people. These actions would prevent any app like Kogan’s from being able to access so much data today.
In 2015, we learned from journalists at The Guardian that Kogan had shared data from his app with Cambridge Analytica. It is against our policies for developers to share data without people’s consent, so we immediately banned Kogan’s app from our platform, and demanded that Kogan and Cambridge Analytica formally certify that they had deleted all improperly acquired data. They provided these certifications.
Last week, we learned from The Guardian, The New York Times and Channel 4 that Cambridge Analytica may not have deleted the data as they had certified. We immediately banned them from using any of our services. Cambridge Analytica claims they have already deleted the data and has agreed to a forensic audit by a firm we hired to confirm this. We’re also working with regulators as they investigate what happened.
This was a breach of trust between Kogan, Cambridge Analytica and Facebook. But it was also a breach of trust between Facebook and the people who share their data with us and expect us to protect it. We need to fix that.
In this case, we already took the most important steps a few years ago in 2014 to prevent bad actors from accessing people’s information in this way. But there’s more we need to do and I’ll outline those steps here:
First, we will investigate all apps that had access to large amounts of information before we changed our platform to dramatically reduce data access in 2014, and we will conduct a full audit of any app with suspicious activity. We will ban any developer from our platform that does not agree to a thorough audit. And if we find developers that misused personally identifiable information, we will ban them and tell everyone affected by those apps. That includes people whose data Kogan misused here as well.
Second, we will restrict developers’ data access even further to prevent other kinds of abuse. For example, we will remove developers’ access to your data if you haven’t used their app in 3 months. We will reduce the data you give an app when you sign in — to only your name, profile photo, and email address. We’ll require developers to not only get approval but also sign a contract in order to ask anyone for access to their posts or other private data. And we’ll have more changes to share in the next few days.
Third, we want to make sure you understand which apps you’ve allowed to access your data. In the next month, we will show everyone a tool at the top of your News Feed with the apps you’ve used and an easy way to revoke those apps’ permissions to your data. We already have a tool to do this in your privacy settings, and now we will put this tool at the top of your News Feed to make sure everyone sees it.
Beyond the steps we had already taken in 2014, I believe these are the next steps we must take to continue to secure our platform.
I started Facebook, and at the end of the day I’m responsible for what happens on our platform. I’m serious about doing what it takes to protect our community. While this specific issue involving Cambridge Analytica should no longer happen with new apps today, that doesn’t change what happened in the past. We will learn from this experience to secure our platform further and make our community safer for everyone going forward.
I want to thank all of you who continue to believe in our mission and work to build this community together. I know it takes longer to fix all these issues than we’d like, but I promise you we’ll work through this and build a better service over the long term.
Questa non è l’unica grana per Zuckerberg. Facebook è in difficoltà da anni proprio a causa della sua diffusione capillare e del fatto che praticamente chiunque possiede un profilo. Sarebbe il sogno di ogni azienda, ma gli si sta ritorcendo contro.
Gli utenti sono sempre meno propensi a pubblicare stati e pensieri personali nonché foto che li ritraggono.
Il fenomeno è quello del “context collapse”: se io scrivo un dato post potrei ottenere l’approvazione del mio amico ma la disapprovazione del mio datore di lavoro o di un mio parente. Nel dubbio non scrivo più niente e non mi espongo né nel bene né nel male.
La cosa davvero preoccupante per i vertici di Facebook è che il boom di iscrizioni di over 50 ha causato un’emorragia di giovanissimi (immaginate un ventenne quanto possa essere disposto a pubblicare una foto di una sbronza colossale sottoponendola di fatto alla visione di genitori e zii). E un social popolato da soli vecchi è un social destinato a morire, proprio come avviene in un paese a natalità zero.